← Search

Debbie Vande Kamp

Ammon, ID
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 22W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debbie Vande Kamp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Mixed Berries · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with DJ Calderwood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · Mixed Berries · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kent Waddoups mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-19 · Mixed Berries · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kent Waddoups mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-29 · Racket Stars · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crista Rostrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · Racket Stars · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · Racket Stars · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · More Fun* · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Ivie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · More Fun* · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sherri Overton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-27 · More Fun* · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
15.8%
3W–16L · 33.4% of games
3.0
21.7%
5W–18L · 32.7% of games
6.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 35.5% of games
2.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.6% of games
5.5mixed
18.2%
4W–18L · 32.4% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 17.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams