Teams

Unforced Terrors

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-22vs Karen McGeeWon 20
W#1 DoublesNyla Kress / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Karen McGee / Anne MacLachlan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Cara Sonnemann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-15vs Karen McGeeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Nelson / Teresa Henderson vs Wendy Elison / Dolly Gonzales3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnita Gibson / Nyla Kress vs Amy Cunningham / Robbie Spicer6-0, 6-4
2026-06-11vs Karen McGeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesLurline Berry / Panayota Semons-Short vs Dolly Gonzales / Lorie Murray6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJacqualyn Nelson / Teresa Henderson vs Shauna Myler / Wendy Elison7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Nelson / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Anne MacLachlan / Karen McGee3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-01vs Karen McGeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesNyla Kress / Michele Surmelis vs Wendy Elison / Dolly Gonzales7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJacqualyn Nelson / Cara Sonnemann vs Christine Paulsen / Theresa Mansfield6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLurline Berry / Panayota Semons-Short vs Karen Dickerson / Shauna Myler6-0, 6-2
2026-05-27vs Karen McGeeLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Cara Sonnemann vs Theresa Mansfield / Christine Paulsen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / Michele Surmelis vs Dolly Gonzales / Karen Dickerson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Nelson / Anita Gibson vs Lorie Murray / Robbie Spicer6-2, 6-4
2026-05-20vs Karen McGeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesNyla Kress / Michele Surmelis vs Dolly Gonzales / Wendy Elison6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Jacqualyn Nelson vs Karen McGee / Anne MacLachlan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnita Gibson / Lurline Berry vs Karen Grasso / Amy Cunningham6-0, 6-3
2026-05-11vs Karen McGeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Nelson / Cara Sonnemann vs Christine Paulsen / Theresa Mansfield7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNyla Kress / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Robbie Spicer / Amy Cunningham6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Patricia Bolinger vs Venita Petti / Karen Dickerson6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Unforced Terrors5215613142
2Karen McGee2561533217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Nyla Kress
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Lurline Berry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Jacqualyn Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Teresa Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Cara Sonnemann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Patricia Bolinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Lisa Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Anita Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Michele Surmelis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Panayota Semons-Short
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Gibson + Panayota Semons-Short3253% games+14.8% vs expected
Lurline Berry + Michele Surmelis8066% games+7.3% vs expected
Lurline Berry + Panayota Semons-Short6457% games+5.5% vs expected
Nyla Kress + Michele Surmelis19265% games+4.5% vs expected
Teresa Henderson + Jacqualyn Nelson8267% games+4.5% vs expected
Patricia Bolinger + Lisa Nelson4254% games+3.1% vs expected
Lisa Nelson + Teresa Henderson181655% games+0.1% vs expected
Lurline Berry + Jacqualyn Nelson7749% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nyla Kress
103W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Lurline Berry
88W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Jacqualyn Nelson
214W–199L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Teresa Henderson
127W–103L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Cara Sonnemann
67W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Patricia Bolinger
33W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Lisa Nelson
73W–131L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Anita Gibson
146W–134L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Michele Surmelis
240W–166L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
73W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Panayota Semons-Short
104W–117L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.