← Search

Aleesa Wilcox

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 35W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Aleesa Wilcox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Bryan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · Bryan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily McCormick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · The Tennis Chicks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonja Facer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · 40 Love · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · The Tennis Chicks · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · Bryan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · The Tennis Chicks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherie Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-28 · Bryan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cori Cannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · 40 Love · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-23 · The Tennis Chicks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonja Facer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · Bryan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily McCormick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · 40 Love · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.1% of games
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 58.1% of games
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 43.2% of games
5.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Singles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert