Search

Emily McCormick

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
48 matches · 21W–27L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
6%
stay 3.0
94%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 45% stay · 55% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.12 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Idaho Falls · 3.0
11 of 51
ID · 3.0
51 of 240
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Emily is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.0201920212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Emily has gone from the 3rd to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 52.8% of games
3.0
45%
9W–11L · 49.1% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.9% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cori Cannon
0.012below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Kristin Di Bona / Kathryn Hilton
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellie Willardson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aleesa Wilcox
0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.045below expectation — took 55% of games against 70% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Nichole Ball / Cori Cannon
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Bennett
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.009about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.036better than expected — took 50% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Emma Shurtliff
2026-06-01 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-21 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-18 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.020about as expected — took 25% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Nicole Baldwin
2026-05-14 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.