← Search

Rebecca Clift-French

Eagle, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 78W–125L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Clift-French to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
W
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Dewey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cameron Schultz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cameron Schultz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Derrick O'Neill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Dewey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Nothing But Love 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Moussalli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Nothing But Love youngsters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbie Hover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · Nothing But Love 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Lehner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-09 · Nothing But Love youngsters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Clanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · Nothing But Love 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · Nothing But Love youngsters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Clanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-11 · Nothing But Love · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Moussalli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 69.8% of games
3.5
34%
36W–70L · 44.6% of games
4.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 32.3% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.6% of games
7.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 39.8% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.3% of games
6.5mixed
40.6%
13W–19L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
42 matches
#1 Singles
21%
42 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert