Search

Abbie Hover

Star, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
49 matches · 22W–27L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Abbie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Abbie has gone from the 14th to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 68.9% of games
3.5
30.8%
8W–18L · 44.8% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
W
Saundra Coronado / Monica Sorensen
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Clanton
+0.012better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Addie Harris
2026-06-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.032better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Terri Mulcahy / Dana Rusin
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Clift-French
0.028below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jessika Hulewsky / Mandy Bergstrom
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kylie Nesbit
0.052below expectation — took 37% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kylie Nesbit / Karie Pappani
2026-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Moser
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jennifer Mitchell / Valerie Roberts
2026-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Sloop
+0.041better than expected — took 56% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Christin Steele / Chandra Zenner-Ford
2026-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Young
+0.034better than expected — took 52% of games against 38% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Betsy McDonald / Michelle Johnston
2026-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen German
0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Erica Laursen / Marnie Newton
2026-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Young
0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Jennifer Small / Katie Nelson
2026-01-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Young
+0.058better than expected — took 62% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Nelda Denton / Fariss Mcgee
2026-01-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Moser
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Smith
0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.