← Search

Mandy Bergstrom

Eagle, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 62W–28L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Mandy Bergstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Fall Fusion · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessika Hulewsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Quin Hoellwarth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Bishop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessika Hulewsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Merrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessika Hulewsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessika Hulewsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Merrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · NetChix 18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessika Hulewsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · YOURS! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
91.3%
21W–2L · 69.6% of games
3.5
63.9%
23W–13L · 55.8% of games
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 55.3% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#1 Singles
14%
13 matches
#2 Singles
11%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova