← Search

Steven Bishop

EMMETT, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 48W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steven Bishop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mandy Bergstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Hardy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-12 · #2 Doubles · with Gary Hanada championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-11 · #1 Doubles · with Alan Keefe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Gary Hanada championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Gary Hanada championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-05-27 · NWW-MC-Gilkey · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ray Hisayasu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-23 · NWW-MC-Gilkey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ray Hisayasu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-14 · NWW-MC-Gilkey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carter Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-04-22 · NWW-MC-Gilkey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ray Hisayasu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-15 · NWW-MC-Gilkey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Berge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-12-08 · #3 Doubles · with Ray Hisayasu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 59% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.3% of games
6.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 55.9% of games
7.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 50.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams