← Search

Christopher Thomas

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 63W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christopher Thomas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-08-13 · IRV-Gerber · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jim Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · IRV-Gerber · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Eugene Avery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fred Kowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · IRV-Gerber · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Eugene Avery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Christopher Gilmore / Jim Borell
2026-06-18 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Vilath Oudomphong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · with Philip Rothrock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Philip Rothrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-26 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Philip Rothrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Philip Rothrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-09-27 · IRV-LaMontagne · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andy Mones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
65%
13W–7L · 60.4% of games
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 56.6% of games
6.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 53.6% of games
7.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 59.4% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert