Search

Jim Gerber

Portland, OR
3.0A year-end 2025
114 matches · 66W–48L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
197 of 357
OR · 3.0
332 of 600

Jim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams76 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jim has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 3 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Jim has gone from the 72nd to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 56% of games
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.2% of games
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.3% of games
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 60% of games
7.0
61.9%
26W–16L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history114 matches
W
Francisco Hevia / Takeshi Nanbu
2026-07-23 · IRV-Gerber · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Eugene Avery
0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · IRV-Gerber · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fred Kowell
+0.003below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · IRV-Franck · #3 Doubles · with Fred Kowell
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-16 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Philip Rothrock
+0.014better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-10 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Rothert
0.012about as expected — took 47% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Lang
+0.009better than expected — took 56% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Abhisar Gupta / Dylan Martell
2026-03-21 · IRV-Franck · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doug Cooke
+0.023better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-18 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eugene Avery
0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · IRV-Franck · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Backer
+0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · IRV-Franck · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rich Brown
0.054below expectation — took 37% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-04 · IRV-Franck · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Franck
+0.025better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · IRV-Harris · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Gordon
+0.063better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.