← Search

Steve Snyder

Gresham, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 43W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Snyder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
Christopher Gilmore / Greg van Gasse
2026-08-14 · CAC-Hevia · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Steve Honodel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · CAC-Hevia · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Steve Honodel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · CAC-Hevia · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Errol Isenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-18 · CAC-Hevia · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Francisco Hevia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · CAC-Hevia · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Errol Isenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-23 · CAC-Ramsey/Shaw · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami McAra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · with Errol Isenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-14 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Errol Isenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · CAC-Ramsey/Shaw · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marje Ferek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-01 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Errol Isenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-09 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Eastwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-03 · CAC-Hevia/Eastwood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ed Kluss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–5L · 36.5% of games
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 37.8% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
90%
18W–2L · 65.2% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 62.4% of games
7.0mixed
31%
9W–20L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova