← Search

Mark Rothert

Portland, OR
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
73 matches · 44W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Rothert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-08-13 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Vilath Oudomphong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-02 · IRV-Gerber · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fred Kowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fred Kowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · with David Bledsoe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · with David Bledsoe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erica Coughlin-Glaser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-29 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Bledsoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Minda Garvens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-23 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Bledsoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nozomi Bray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-10 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams96 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
80%
8W–2L · 59.1% of games
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 63.3% of games
7.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 56.9% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer