Search

Mark Rothert

Portland, OR
3.0S year-end 2026
72 matches · 43W–29L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
64%
stay 3.0
36%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.97 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
96 of 357
OR · 3.0
159 of 600

Mark is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams96 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Mark has gone from the 88th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 60% of games
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 63.3% of games
7.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 56.9% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
W
Steve Snyder / Steve Honodel
2026-07-23 · IRV-Gerber · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Vilath Oudomphong
0.012about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Marc MacHiz / Chip Rosenfeld
2026-07-02 · IRV-Gerber · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fred Kowell
+0.095better than expected — took 92% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Jed Macy / Daniel Boyce
2026-06-25 · IRV-Gerber · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fred Kowell
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · IRV-Harris · #1 Doubles · with David Bledsoe
0.004about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · IRV-Harris · #1 Doubles · with David Bledsoe
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
May Graham / Paul Sealmixed
2026-05-17 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erica Coughlin-Glaser
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-29 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Bledsoe
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Marcia Hartson / Chris Hartsonmixed
2026-04-26 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Minda Garvens
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-23 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Bledsoe
+0.019better than expected — took 57% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Lynn Lotti / Bill Barnesmixed
2026-04-11 · IRV-Townsend/Laidley · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nozomi Bray
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-10 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Gerber
0.012about as expected — took 47% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · NOR-IRV-Thomas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Bledsoe
0.010about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.