Teams

IRV-Townsend/Laidley

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Erin Rothrock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.13
Bryan Potter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Lucia Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Paul Burkhart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Heather Selis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Mark Rothert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Luis Ponce de Leon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Deborah Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Nozomi Bray
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.85
Philip Rothrock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
James Lang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Erica Coughlin-Glaser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Erin Rothrock
36W–19L career
0%22%78%
3.21
3
Bryan Potter
69W–39L career
0%43%57%
3.13
3
Lucia Parker
50W–35L career
0%59%41%
3.08
3
Paul Burkhart
28W–40L career
0%61%39%
3.07
3
Heather Selis
35W–60L career
0%82%18%
2.98
3
Mark Rothert
43W–29L career · type S
0%85%15%
2.97
3
Luis Ponce de Leon
78W–46L career
0%92%8%
2.94
3
Deborah Cohen
65W–38L career
0%96%4%
2.88
3
Nozomi Bray
60W–110L career
0%97%3%
2.88
3
Philip Rothrock
33W–15L career
0%96%3%
2.85
3
James Lang
31W–28L career
1%98%2%
2.79
3
Erica Coughlin-Glaser
25W–16L career
3%97%1%
2.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.