Search

Jed Macy

Tigard, OR
3.5S year-end 2025
22 matches · 11W–11L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.53
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
36%
stay 3.5
64%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 78% stay · 22% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.44. Lower than today’s 3.53 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.5
49 of 836

Jed is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Daniel Boyce
+0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Daniel Boyce
0.052below expectation — took 48% of games against 66% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Larry Butrick
0.022about as expected — took 68% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Doug Cumming
0.029about as expected — took 67% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
James Veninger / Mary Kaumpmixed
2026-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Merri Wells
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
John Thekkethala / Kemp Buononato
2026-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marvin Cantos
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
L
Shannon Schuld-Gray / Michael Estanolmixed
2026-02-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maureen Rowles
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
David Parish / Brian Scullion
2026-02-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Legg
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
W
Annie Ottesen / Thomas Wumixed
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Kunze
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Peter Taylor / Garrett Mullen
2026-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Legg
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
graeme sewell / Erin Craigmixed
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Kunze
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
N/Amixed
2026-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Kunze
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.