Search

Doug Cumming

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
52 matches · 27W–25L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
29 of 52
OR · 3.0
354 of 600

Doug is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams17 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Doug has gone from the 44th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 51.6% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.9% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 38.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-07-25 · SHC-Gitt/Cannon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marianne McIntosh
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Marc Sussman / James Carey
2026-07-24 · SHC-Cumming · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Paul Blankenmeister
+0.011better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · N OR-SHC-Denney · #1 Doubles · with Thomas MacDonald
+0.031better than expected — took 72% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Mark LeMaster / Frank Taylorchamps
2026-06-27 · N OR-SHC-Denney · #1 Doubles · with Thomas MacDonald
0.011below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · N OR-SHC-Denney · #2 Doubles · with Thomas MacDonald
0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · SHC-Cumming · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jed Macy
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · SHC-Cumming · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Anderson
0.017below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · SHC-Cumming · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kerry Sweet
0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-23 · SHC-Cumming · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Havens
0.019below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · SHC-Hartson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracey Beagle
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-17 · SHC-Cumming · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Anderson
0.050below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · SHC-Hartson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacy Cain
+0.000about as expected — took 32% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.