Search

Stacy Cain

Sherwood, OR
3.0S year-end 2025
10 matches · 1W–9L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.54
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
32%
down to 2.5
68%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 19% down · 81% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.57. Higher than today’s 2.54 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sherwood · 3.0
6 of 6
OR · 3.0
584 of 600

Stacy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacy has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 21% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 21% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history10 matches
L
2026-07-11 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with JAMES KYUNG
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-04 · SHC-Hartson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Walker
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 25% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-28 · SHC-Hartson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doug Cumming
+0.000about as expected — took 32% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Rebecca Ostrom / Lori Merchel
2026-03-27 · SHC-McIntosh/Brock · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Wagner
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · SHC-Hartson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pete Baughman
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Diana Cheng / Jihyun Kang
2026-01-31 · SHC-McIntosh/Brock · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly McDonald
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-01-25 · SHC-McIntosh/Brock · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne McIntosh
0.071below expectation — took 0% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-10 · SHC-McIntosh/Brock · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lillian Lee
0.040below expectation — took 0% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-07 · SHC-Jacobo/Young · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Wagner
0.048below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Betty Koon / Diana Crawford
2025-04-19 · SHC-Jacobo/Young · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcia Hartson
0.060below expectation — took 8% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.