Search

Leanne Kong

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
64 matches · 30W–34L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
27 of 52
OR · 3.0
349 of 600

Leanne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leanne has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Leanne has gone from the 45th to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
16W–16L · 50.8% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
7W–7L · 52.6% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 30% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Bonnie Song
2026-07-12 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.082below expectation — took 25% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Vanessa Gebbie
2026-07-03 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Azure Olson
2026-07-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.018below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Susan Sienko / Dara Abraham
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurel Soot
0.033below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jasmine Vuong / Karissa Ditgen
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xiaobo Dai
0.031below expectation — took 46% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.067better than expected — took 57% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglas Bennett
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.032better than expected — took 40% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Cordelia Tilghman / Jacklyn Stellway
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xiaobo Dai
0.012below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Dee Dee Elsey / Julie Mathews
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Putterman
0.014below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.