← Search

Xiaobo Dai

Lake Oswego, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 38W–38L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Xiaobo Dai to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Mixit 2 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Sarah Carnaroli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-5
W
2026-07-23 · Mixit 2 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kelsi Roberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-2
W
2026-07-23 · Mixit 2 · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Wiengkhone Soumpholphakdy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-5
L
2026-07-19 · Dai · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · Dai · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leanne Kong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · MPRC-Dai/Elliot · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katherine FitzGibbon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-22 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rupali Avasare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · MPRC-Dai/Elliot · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Angela Keating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · MPRC-Dai/Elliot · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Angela Keating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leanne Kong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · MPRC-Dai/Elliot · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
61.7%
29W–18L · 54.5% of games
3.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.1% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer