Search

Cory Sebastian

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
71 matches · 41W–30L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.63
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
5%
stay 2.5
95%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 42% stay · 58% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.52. Lower than today’s 2.63 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 2.5
10 of 34
OR · 2.5
16 of 61

Cory is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cory has been 2.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.02.5202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Cory has gone from the 47th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
61.5%
24W–15L · 55.4% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.2% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
L
JEAN CHEN / Jeffrey Baylessmixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Gibson
+0.000better than expected — took 41% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Katalin Wiggins / Lauren Fiala
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Philberta Leung
+0.006better than expected — took 86% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Anna Catibayan / Kate Wyatt
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Andrea Cedfeldt
+0.045better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
John Crawford / Anca Tudorachemixed
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paul Walker
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Leavitt
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Amy Tam-naulty / GREGORY NAULTYmixed
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Louis Fontenot Jr
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jered Cuenco / Betty Koonmixed
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Leavitt
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Xiaobo Dai / Katherine FitzGibbon
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Yasmine Foroud
+0.009better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Priscila Montoya / Ari Douangpanya
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Irene Gilbertson
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Chelle Kenison / Hyun Jeong Min
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Andrea Cedfeldt
+0.004about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Alison Heath / Brenda Elliottchamps
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · with Dana Valverde
0.053below expectation — took 40% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Marcia Hartson / Melissa Gitt
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Philberta Leung
+0.052better than expected — took 59% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.