← Search

Lisa Mayer

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 79W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Mayer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-07-17 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Arendt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kerry Sweet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Elicia Putnam championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Susanne Cochran championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Place mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · SHC-Lee/Priest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-03-14 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-14 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cricket Forsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Cricket Forsey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 56.7% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75%
15W–5L · 59.1% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
67.9%
19W–9L · 60.2% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
8W–16L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
26 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer