Search

Cynthia Escamilla

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
73 matches · 43W–30L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
246 of 357
OR · 3.0
410 of 600

Cynthia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cynthia has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Cynthia has gone from the 26th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.5% of games
3.0
54.5%
18W–15L · 53.3% of games
6.0
50%
5W–5L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Self
0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Bennett
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Monet Hammond / Sarah Wang
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Self
0.044below expectation — took 44% of games against 61% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Erin Boehm / Nicholas Boehmmixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Bennett
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Self
+0.006better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Lisa Rapaport / Leslie Bienen
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Self
+0.009better than expected — took 77% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 4-2
W
Nicole Kennely / Danny Petermixed
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Harkin
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Deb Landau / Leola Ristau
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Self
+0.020better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Scott Thomas / Bridghid McMonaglemixed
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeremy Harkin
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Self
+0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Self
0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Self
+0.030better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.