Search

Adriana McCord

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
83 matches · 42W–41L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.02
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
38%
stay 3.0
62%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 79% stay · 21% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.02 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.0
9 of 52
WA · 3.0
205 of 755

Adriana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Adriana has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Adriana has gone from the 7th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
22W–22L · 51.4% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.3% of games
6.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Damiano
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · THPRD-Horenstein/Pham · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with TRIET NGUYEN
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jody McCord
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · THPRD-Horenstein/Pham · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregg Palmer
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Heredia
0.016about as expected — took 75% of games against 72% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Penny Mclain / Doug Zennmixed
2026-07-05 · VTC-Vail/Shue · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cal Szueber
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Molly Albright / Leslie Bienen
2026-06-14 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Venezia
0.005about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Kheoshi Owens / Paddy McShane
2026-06-13 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joann Szueber
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jennifer Johnson / Julie LaMontagne
2026-05-23 · CGM-Kropp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Venezia
+0.035better than expected — took 53% of games against 40% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Parks
+0.001better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · CGM-Kropp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.