← Search

Jaime Venezia

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 62W–33L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Jaime Venezia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-09-13 · THPRD-Pham/Horenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with TRIET NGUYEN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-5
L
Annie Chen / Tuni Stecker
2026-09-12 · CGM-Locke/Venezia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with David Pham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Joann Szueber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Heredia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregg Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Heredia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-05 · NOR-THPRD-Horenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henry Vu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Larissa Kazantsev championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Christina Parks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Shannon Lucas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.1% of games
3.0
68.6%
24W–11L · 58.6% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 55.8% of games
6.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 64.5% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 38.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert