← Search

Christina Parks

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 55W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christina Parks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Jaime Venezia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Joann Szueber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Jaime Venezia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alisa Rakoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adriana McCord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Belindean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alisa Rakoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · CGM-Venezia/Locke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Self
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-21 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yu-Fei Chou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-15 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adriana McCord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-07 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with ROSY ALANIS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-24 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Venezia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
51.4%
36W–34L · 50.4% of games
3.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 37.8% of games
6.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.2% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe