← Search

Marianne Mikkelson

Tacoma, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 51W–104L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Marianne Mikkelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
W
2026-09-12 · GTC-Dalrymple-Aces 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hwayoung Srein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · LRC-Barnes-Mixed Lobsters 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Mikkelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-12 · LRC-Barnes-Mixed Lobsters 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Baird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Liz VanDerschelden championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Liz VanDerschelden championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Liz VanDerschelden championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadine Johnson Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-06 · LRC-Barnes-Mixed Lobsters 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Mikkelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-23 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Dymarkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · GTC-Neeley-Too Much · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sachiko Urano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-02 · LRC-Baird · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sam Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 41.7% of games
3.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 50.6% of games
3.5
25.9%
15W–43L · 39.9% of games
6.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 53.9% of games
7.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 48.2% of games
6.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#1 Singles
16%
24 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams