← Search

Antonette Wood

Issaquah, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
278 matches · 147W–131L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.27
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 44 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 3.5
14 of 21
WA · 3.5
660 of 1209

Antonette is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Antonette has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Antonette has gone from the 44th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
59.7%
80W–54L · 53.2% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.7% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
65.3%
32W–17L · 55.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
3W–18L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history278 matches
W
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
−0.015about as expected — took 60% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Rutchel Lois Abella / Michelle Dauphiny Becker
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
+0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tyson Dickman
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan McLaughlin
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
+0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Colleen Edwards / Peyman Oreizymixed
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tyson Dickman
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
−0.025below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
−0.015about as expected — took 57% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Gerrans
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Madalena McAllen
+0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
+0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.