Search

Kimberly Caponigro

Mill Creek, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
244 matches · 107W–137L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 40 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
24%
down to 3.0
76%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 15% down · 85% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.08. Higher than today’s 3.06 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mill Creek · 3.5
11 of 12
WA · 3.5
1167 of 1209

Kimberly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kimberly has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kimberly has gone from the 69th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
55.8%
58W–46L · 51.7% of games
4.0
23.5%
8W–26L · 39% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 59.7% of games
6.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
34.1%
14W–27L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
30.8%
8W–18L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history244 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jinhee Park
+0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lloyd Sandquist
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 43% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Katie van Zyl / Atanas Koralskimixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vickram Jairamani
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Joseph
+0.000better than expected — took 38% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jinhee Park
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with AL King
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jinhee Park
0.038below expectation — took 44% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Xin Cheng / XIAOOU ZHUANGmixed
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vickram Jairamani
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Thomas Barbano / Jennifer Heydtmixed
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephen Dame
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Rebecca Feyerick / Stephanie Gauthier
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Anderson
0.036below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with AL King
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Mark Moskal / Annette de Sotomixed
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Walt Drevas
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.