← Search

Jennifer Combs

Shoreline, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
224 matches · 150W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.36
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 35 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
4%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.31. Lower than today’s 3.36 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Shoreline · 3.5
4 of 22
WA · 3.5
379 of 1209

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jennifer has gone from the 56th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
73%
73W–27L · 58.9% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 40.1% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
75.8%
47W–15L · 62.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history224 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Furman
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Bonnie Ziegler / Huy Ngomixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stan Steele
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christa Eadson
−0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Max Genereaux
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Max Genereaux
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Hardin Warren / Lindsay Swanson
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Crews
−0.003about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Combs
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Furman
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Eunji Fuller
+0.039better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Schroeder
+0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Crews
−0.009better than expected — took 100% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Kadoshima
−0.031below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.