Teams

AYTC (Daytime) W Squared-Willis

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.77 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-13vs EDG (Daytime) One Shot Matters-KainzSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBeth Rossi / Lori van Holmes vs Jessica Closson / Kristin Brennock1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Hardie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Steen / Sherri Wolson vs Edna Kainz / Antonette Wood7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesVenus Velazquez / Katrina Miller vs Gunjan Tykodi / Holly Ng4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLori van Holmes / Susan Thornberg vs Anna Duff / Yuka Kimura0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Shore vs Nadine Ramstead6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnnelliott Willis / Nicole Hardie vs Carly Oberg / Linda Baker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVenus Velazquez / Pamela Lavitt vs Ruoh-Shin Lumpkin / Jodi Paulson0-6, 1-6
2026-02-27vs PL (Daytime) Allied Aces-HaluptzokLost 04
L#1 DoublesLori van Holmes / Carrie Steen vs Archana Kumar / Jill Lang5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLori Clithero vs Joanna Foss3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesVenus Velazquez / Beth Rossi vs Kristin Blasko / Chenoa Haluptzok3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Shore / Jennifer Combs vs Jenny Blumenstein / Holly Hanson4-6, 4-6
2026-02-20vs EDG (Daytime) One Shot Matters-KainzSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLori van Holmes / Carrie Steen vs Sharon Jaeger / Gina Sjolander6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPamela Lavitt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesVenus Velazquez / Jennifer Meisner vs Edna Kainz / Mary Hougan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Thornberg / Nicole Hardie vs Kristin Brennock / Jessica Closson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSherri Wolson / Nancy Shore vs Michelle Neal / Anna Duff1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLori Clithero vs Mindy Marquart2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Van Ewyk / Jennifer Combs vs Carly Oberg / Linda Baker1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnnelliott Willis / Beth Rossi vs Kimberly Skorupa / Lorraine Wong4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-02-06vs PL (Daytime) Allied Aces-HaluptzokLost 04
L#1 DoublesKatherine Van Ewyk / Beth Rossi vs Katie Stark / Jill Lang3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLori Clithero vs Kristin Blasko4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnnelliott Willis / Lori van Holmes vs Chenoa Haluptzok / Archana Kumar6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Thornberg / Katrina Miller vs Mia Koida / Mindy Richardson4-6, 0-6
2026-01-30vs EDG (Daytime) One Shot Matters-KainzSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Meisner / Katherine Van Ewyk vs Gunjan Tykodi / Gina Sjolander4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLori Clithero vs Kristin Brennock4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Hardie / Beth Rossi vs Michelle Kutz / Soojin To6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnnelliott Willis / Sherri Wolson vs Mary Hougan / Edna Kainz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSusan Thornberg / Katherine Van Ewyk vs Anna Duff / Michelle Neal4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPamela Lavitt vs Mindy Marquart3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Steen / Katrina Miller vs Yuka Kimura / Sheri Bennett4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Combs / Nancy Shore vs Helen Chiang / Tracy Qi2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Carrie Steen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Venus Velazquez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Katherine Van Ewyk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Susan Thornberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Nancy Shore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.63
Annelliott Willis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Beth Rossi
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Lori van Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.41
Jennifer Combs
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Lori Clithero
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Katrina Miller
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.23
Jennifer Meisner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Nicole Hardie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Sherri Wolson
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Pamela Lavitt
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Hardie + Lori Clithero17758% games+4.9% vs expected
Annelliott Willis + Sherri Wolson11655% games+1.0% vs expected
Jennifer Meisner + Beth Rossi2354% games−2.5% vs expected
Annelliott Willis + Lori van Holmes134 matchesnot enough data
Venus Velazquez + Pamela Lavitt224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Thornberg + Lori van Holmes224 matchesnot enough data
Annelliott Willis + Venus Velazquez123 matchesnot enough data
Venus Velazquez + Sherri Wolson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carrie Steen
37W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Venus Velazquez
15W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Katherine Van Ewyk
3W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Susan Thornberg
91W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Nancy Shore
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Annelliott Willis
40W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63
4
Beth Rossi
81W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Lori van Holmes
59W–101L career · 5 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Jennifer Combs
152W–74L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Lori Clithero
116W–67L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Katrina Miller
74W–50L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Jennifer Meisner
53W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Nicole Hardie
132W–73L career · 10 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Sherri Wolson
87W–80L career · 8 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Pamela Lavitt
66W–59L career · 9 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.