← Search

Robert Mann

Shoreline, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
129 matches · 86W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.00
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
48%
down to 4.0
52%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 29% down · 71% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.05. Higher than today’s 4.00 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Shoreline · 4.5
8 of 8
WA · 4.5
246 of 364

Robert is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Robert has been a steady 4.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

4.04.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Robert has gone from the 30th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
14W–0L · 70.2% of games
4.5
55.7%
34W–27L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
69.4%
25W–11L · 58% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history129 matches
L
Amy Hsu / Jason Hsumixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Evans
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Lohit Verma / Alexander Katz
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with ADITYA MIDDHA
+0.010better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Haeckel
−0.078about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Bronson Shonk / Jeremiah Bayna
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Haeckel
+0.037better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Loic Deniel / Kevin Larson
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Darko Stankovic
−0.022below expectation — took 52% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
David Emery-Peck / Mike Wilsonchamps
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · with Jeffrey Jablonski
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Mario Lopez / Issei Komatsu
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with PJ Kwon
+0.008about as expected — took 46% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Jeffrey Stoner / David Han
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Drake
−0.008below expectation — took 39% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Drake
−0.003about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Jablonski
+0.027better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Kim
−0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.