Teams

HBSQ-Mann

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-03-14vs BC-SzeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Abram / Gavin Landon vs Robert Lewis / Clifford Flekser1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamarth Mehta / Aaron Dixon vs David Han / David Feller2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Mann / PJ Kwon vs Mario Lopez / Issei Komatsu7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-03-08vs NTC-FogtSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLuke Barry / Ben Falk vs Grant Hartvigson / Aaron Coe6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristopher Sackmann vs Anthony Auriemma6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSamarth Mehta / Aaron Dixon vs Todd Raymond / Gregory Skaggs2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPJ Kwon / Jeff McKatims vs Evan Schmidt / Josh Fogt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Sackmann / Josh Greene vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-28vs MPRC-StraussWon 10
W#1 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Christopher Sackmann vs Brian Leahy / Mitchell Strauss6-2, 6-3
2026-02-27vs BC-SzeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSamarth Mehta / Aaron Dixon vs John Easley / Mario Lopez6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLuke Barry vs Issei Komatsu4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBen Falk / Jeffrey Jablonski vs Robert Lewis / Clifford Flekser6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Drake / Robert Mann vs Jeffrey Stoner / David Han6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-14vs CP-IyerWon 40
W#1 DoublesBen Falk / Samarth Mehta vs Lyle Li / Skanda Iyer6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLuke Barry vs Qiming Jiang6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Mann / David Drake vs Tim Mcroberts / Steve McRae6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPJ Kwon / Aaron Dixon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-13vs IRV-FordWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Sackmann vs Alex Simpson6-1, 6-0
2026-02-07vs NWW-MI-HagstromWon 31
L#1 DoublesPJ Kwon / Jeff McKatims vs Michael Fleming / Curran Hagstrom2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristopher Sackmann vs Jason Kim6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBen Falk / Luke Barry vs Milt Reimers / Collin Hagstrom6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Mann / Jeffrey Jablonski vs Joshua Glick / Robert Matthews6-3, 7-6
2026-02-01vs RBW-Ohrbeck/VermaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLuke Barry / Ben Falk vs Andreas Ohrbeck / Thomas Donovan6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristopher Sackmann vs Jeffrey Worthington6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJames Kim / Robert Mann vs Varun Verma / Lam Nguyen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeff McKatims / Gavin Landon vs Justin Low / Vietlong Le4-6, 6-7
2026-01-25vs NWW-MI-HagstromLost 04
L#1 DoublesChien Chang / Aaron Dixon vs Collin Hagstrom / Milt Reimers1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLuke Barry vs Jason Kim7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff McKatims / Jeffrey Abram vs Harold Abell / Michael Fleming0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBen Falk / Robert Mann vs Jason Bloom / Jordan Corey3-6, 4-6
2026-01-17vs NTC-FogtSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Abram / Gavin Landon vs Tam Ly / Andrew Ygona3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLuke Barry vs Maros Blaha6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Jablonski / James Kim vs Rodney Jeffers / Arun Chokkalingam6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBen Falk / Chien Chang vs Anthony Auriemma / Evan Schmidt3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Luke Barry
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.35
Christopher Sackmann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.22
PJ Kwon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Ben Falk
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.16
Blake Garfield
published 4.5
4.11
David Drake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Jeff McKatims
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Samarth Mehta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Gavin Landon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Aaron Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.94
Chien Chang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.86
Jeffrey Abram
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
James Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Robert Mann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Jeffrey Jablonski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blake Garfield + James Kim25660% games+5.1% vs expected
Robert Mann + Blake Garfield1447% games+4.5% vs expected
Ben Falk + Chien Chang6551% games−1.0% vs expected
Chien Chang + Jeffrey Abram2336% games−9.9% vs expected
Jeffrey Abram + Jeff McKatims1536% games−10.0% vs expected
Ben Falk + Luke Barry4163% gamesnot enough data
Jeff McKatims + Blake Garfield2345% gamesnot enough data
Aaron Dixon + Samarth Mehta134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Luke Barry
16W–14L career · type A · 11 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Christopher Sackmann
28W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
PJ Kwon
37W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Ben Falk
59W–67L career · 11 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Blake Garfield
97W–55L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
David Drake
32W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Jeff McKatims
21W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
Samarth Mehta
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Gavin Landon
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Aaron Dixon
42W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
4.5
Chien Chang
67W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Jeffrey Abram
27W–50L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
James Kim
48W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4.5
Robert Mann
87W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.64
Jeffrey Jablonski
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.