← Search

Mario Lopez

Sammamish, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 102W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mario Lopez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
W
2026-07-25 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Claudia Huzar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Min Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shera Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Min Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-02 · BC-Chen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Parcel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · BC-Chen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alejandro Oropeza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-04 · BC-Chen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Griff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-14 · BC-Sze · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Issei Komatsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-27 · BC-Sze · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Easley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-15 · BC-Sze · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Johan Bjorklund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4
L
2026-02-07 · BC-Sze · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Feller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-02-01 · BC-Sze · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Feller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 64.9% of games
4.5
54.3%
38W–32L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
64.7%
33W–18L · 53.4% of games
9.0mixed
26.4%
14W–39L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
53 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams