Search

Andrew Parcel

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
126 matches · 71W–55L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.0
12 of 45
WA · 4.0
216 of 782

Andrew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrew has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Andrew has gone from the 47th to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
53.8%
43W–37L · 54.1% of games
4.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 60.1% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history126 matches
L
Alex Vitruk
2026-06-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.016below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.018about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Linsen Wu / Timothy Wu
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Chatalas
+0.088better than expected — took 75% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Werner Marx / Blake Garfield
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mario Lopez
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Andrew Gustafson
2026-04-26 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.055below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Eric Whaley
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sam Varon
0.018about as expected — took 59% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
Charles Hodge / Benjamin Liang
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sam Varon
+0.050better than expected — took 50% of games against 31% expected
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Suraj Devasthali
2026-02-22 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.020better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Fred Wurden / Kent Lundgren
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Thomas
+0.020better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.