Search

Christopher Gipson

Renton, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
210 matches · 125W–85L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
19%
down to 3.5
81%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 12% down · 88% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.57 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 4.0
10 of 14
WA · 4.0
612 of 782

Christopher is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christopher has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Christopher has gone from the 2nd to the 7th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
70.4%
57W–24L · 57.3% of games
4.0
31.7%
13W–28L · 43.5% of games
7.0mixed
62.8%
27W–16L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history210 matches
L
Percy Pan / Michael Qi
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Harriman
+0.043better than expected — took 50% of games against 33% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christie Shan
+0.000better than expected — took 40% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jillian Turner
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Jyo Das
2026-06-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.022better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Meng Shi / Kenneth Daily
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Lee
0.008below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Kevin Kang / Andy Liang
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Cung
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-06 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.021about as expected — took 29% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trish MacDonald
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Matt Gindrechamps
2025-10-25 · #1 Singles
0.066below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Arthur Martirosian / James Murraychamps
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · with Scott Lee
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.