Search

Han Kim

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
95 matches · 60W–35L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
14%
down to 3.5
86%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 9% down · 91% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.61. Higher than today’s 3.59 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.0
35 of 45
WA · 4.0
579 of 782

Han is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Han has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Han has gone from the 90th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
77.8%
28W–8L · 64.8% of games
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
80%
20W–5L · 60.5% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Gipson
+0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hyemin Jeon
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Tomas San Miguel / Scott McConnell
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Harriman
0.003below expectation — took 32% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Harriman
0.009below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Kaptik
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jan Stroh / Eric Lindburgmixed
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hyemin Jeon
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Laka Muralidharan / Vaibhav Bora
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edwin Tanumulia
0.058below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Felix Schuler / Jacob Mann
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deepak Venkateswaran
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Ullas Upendran / Ranjeet Jagtap
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Buchanan
+0.034better than expected — took 45% of games against 33% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Ciccotosto
+0.001about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Ciccotosto
+0.028better than expected — took 56% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 2-3
L
Peter Wachter / Michael Steele
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timur Sadykov
+0.009about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.