Teams

FEARLESS SHAOLIN 4.0

2026 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-05vs Chai & ChallengersLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Harriman / Han Kim vs Mayank Gupta / Deepak Agrawal3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-30vs Dynamic Dingles DuoLost 01
L#1 DoublesHan Kim / Christopher Gipson vs Brandon Nakata / Nicholas Verghese1-6, 6-7
2026-07-23vs Caniac ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesHan Kim / Greg Harriman vs Tomas San Miguel / Scott McConnell6-7, 0-6
2026-07-19vs w(O_o)wLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Gipson / Greg Harriman vs Percy Pan / Michael Qi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-14vs HelloWorld-v2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHan Kim / Greg Harriman vs Prasad Gopalkrishnan / Karthic Lakshmi Rajakumar3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Greg Harriman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Han Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Christopher Gipson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Jason Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Harriman + Han Kim033 matchesnot enough data
Han Kim + Jason Buchanan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Greg Harriman
135W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Han Kim
61W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Christopher Gipson
125W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Jason Buchanan
147W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.