Teams

w(O_o)w

2026 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-02vs 2nd Serve AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Qi / Yu Xiao vs Kenneth Newton / Timur Sadykov6-0, 6-2
2026-07-27vs Caniac ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Qi / Percy Pan vs Tomas San Miguel / Scott McConnell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-24vs HelloWorld-v2Won 10
W#1 DoublesPercy Pan / Yu Xiao vs Prasad Gopalkrishnan / Girish Patwardhan6-3, 6-2
2026-07-19vs FEARLESS SHAOLIN 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesPercy Pan / Michael Qi vs Christopher Gipson / Greg Harriman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-15vs Dynamic Dingles DuoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Qi / Sam Wang vs Brandon Nakata / Nicholas Verghese6-3, 6-3
2026-07-08vs Chai & ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSam Wang / Yu Xiao vs Suvajyoti Bose / Mayank Gupta6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Michael Qi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.00
Percy Pan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Sam Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Renxuan Wang
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Percy Pan + Sam Wang404 matchesnot enough data
Sam Wang + Michael Qi404 matchesnot enough data
Percy Pan + Renxuan Wang213 matchesnot enough data
Percy Pan + Michael Qi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Qi
61W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.03
4
Percy Pan
31W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Sam Wang
30W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.85
3.5
Renxuan Wang
49W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.