← Search

Jacob Mann

Sequim, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 72W–53L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jacob Mann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Bernardo Savitt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Bruno Diaz Torres championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Felix Schuler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Steven Bell / Jason Lin
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Felix Schuler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Felix Schuler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Felix Schuler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · who hired the Hit Mann · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nick Fulcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-08-01 · Fellowship of the String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hans Martin Calle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · who hired the Hit Mann · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bruno Diaz Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-05 · Fellowship of the String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bernardo Savitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Felix Schuler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Felix Schuler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
74.5%
35W–12L · 61.2% of games
4.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 46.6% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 54.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe