← Search

Matthew Ip

Bellevue, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 102W–64L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Matthew Ip to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Andrew Bagherpour championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Andrew Bagherpour championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Andrew Bagherpour championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jeffrey Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Jeffrey Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Yu Xiao / Andrew Zhang
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Jeffrey Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Jeffrey Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · NWW-WSC-Low · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · PSC-Ip · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Ip
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-24 · NWW-WSC-Low · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Kwong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · NWW-WSC-Low · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · NWW-WSC-Low · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 65.7% of games
4.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 52.9% of games
4.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 49% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.9% of games
4.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.7% of games
4.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 38.6% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
27 matches
#1 Male Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Male Singles
10%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams