← Search

Adam Kay

Snoqualmie, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
70 matches · 52W–18L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
183 of 782

Adam is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Adam has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0202020212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Adam has gone from the 90th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
79.6%
39W–10L · 59.5% of games
4.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Lael Banner
+0.021better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Bluehdorn
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lael Banner
+0.025better than expected — took 58% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Borberg
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Chinn
−0.028below expectation — took 63% of games against 69% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Chinn
−0.017below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Lael Banner
−0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wesley Lew
−0.025below expectation — took 59% of games against 66% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lael Banner
−0.063below expectation — took 41% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Nipuna Gunasekera / Ullas Upendran
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Borberg
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Borberg
−0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Jenson Yuen / Pierre Martin
2025-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lael Banner
+0.042better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.