Search

Madhu Jagannathan

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
147 matches · 93W–54L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 4.0
11 of 33
WA · 4.0
222 of 782

Madhu is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Madhu has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Madhu has gone from the 75th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
75.3%
55W–18L · 58.3% of games
4.5
37.9%
11W–18L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history147 matches
W
David Park / Kenneth Cho
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Higashi
0.007about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Varun Saini
+0.058better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Timothy Wu / Kevin Kim
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manu Vij
0.001about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Varun Saini
0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manu Vij
0.027below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Thompson
0.045below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Higashi
+0.020better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Higashi
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Higashi
+0.011better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Chris Pavlin / Aaron Thomas
2026-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Higashi
+0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Pavel Dolezel / Anthony Auriemma
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Higashi
+0.012better than expected — took 57% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-5
L
Michael Liao / Tony Liao
2025-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Varun Saini
0.020below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.