Search

Andrew Royes

Issaquah, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
131 matches · 70W–61L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 4.0
5 of 11
WA · 4.0
300 of 782

Andrew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrew has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Andrew has gone from the 27th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 64.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
20W–40L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
56.7%
17W–13L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renee Waltz
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Recchi
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman / Michelle Cohnmixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Recchi
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Zachary Chalett / Thomas Isarankura
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Miller
0.015below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hsu
0.048below expectation — took 50% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ravi Ramkumar
0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jaime Garcia / Ha Yong Lee
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Weibel
0.002about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
Eliot Tong / William Tong
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Miller
+0.004about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · with Barry Nishimura
0.020below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · with Jason Hsu
+0.022better than expected — took 58% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hsu
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hsu
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.