← Search

Maria Recchi

Snoqualmie, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 127W–130L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Maria Recchi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history257 matches
L
2026-09-13 · EDG-Waltz · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renee Waltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-12 · JTC-Monson-MONHEW 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renee Waltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Rachael Mitchell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Rachael Mitchell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · EDG-Hit & Run-Hei · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · EDG-Hit & Run-Hei · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mick Jaeger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Royes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · EDG-Hit & Run-Hei · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mick Jaeger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Royes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Rachael Mitchell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Rachael Mitchell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · JTC-Monson-Monhew 18+ 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
61.1%
77W–49L · 54.4% of games
4.5
31.5%
17W–37L · 42.2% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
43.8%
21W–27L · 47.6% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
139 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
45 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert