Search

Maria Recchi

Snoqualmie, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
253 matches · 125W–128L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
187 of 782

Maria is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maria has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Maria has gone from the 65th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
61.1%
77W–49L · 54.4% of games
4.5
31.5%
17W–37L · 42.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
43.8%
21W–27L · 47.6% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history253 matches
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Larson
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mick Jaeger
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Royes
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mick Jaeger
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman / Michelle Cohnmixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Royes
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Rachael Mitchell
0.016below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Hanh Hoang / Nicole Minassianchamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Rachael Mitchell
0.065below expectation — took 20% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
+0.061better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Carol Gregory / Lyndsey Gillis
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
0.027below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachael Mitchell
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
0.065below expectation — took 40% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Amy Fuller / Anna Halbur
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Corddry
+0.026better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.