Search

Cheryl Capriola

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
161 matches · 113W–48L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.77
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
48 of 186
WA · 4.0
197 of 782

Cheryl is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cheryl has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Cheryl has gone from the 97th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 59.4% of games
3.5
82.8%
24W–5L · 65.5% of games
4.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 55.8% of games
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 63.2% of games
8.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history161 matches
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Rush
+0.000below expectation — took 56% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Marks
0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Evan Cohn
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Rush
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Broadwin
+0.002about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Shoultz
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Kathy Brandt / Dianne Discolo
2026-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Monica McCready
+0.034better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Tammy Pronenko / Janet Tallett
2026-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kayce McEwan
0.044below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Carol Piscitelli / Beverly Hovorka
2026-02-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan D Morin
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Janice Campbell / Alice Souders
2026-01-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Reyes
+0.045better than expected — took 71% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Allyson Marks / Karin Conroy
2025-12-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Reyes
+0.012better than expected — took 57% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Ruth White / Karen Roosen
2025-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Irwin
+0.059better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.