← Search

Kira Sorensen

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 58W–39L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kira Sorensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-09-11 · STC-Better With Age-Czeisler · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeannie Trautmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-29 · STC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Trautmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willemijn de Clercq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-24 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Satterwhite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willemijn de Clercq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willemijn de Clercq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-28 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie McReynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-21 · STC-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Odom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-14 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willemijn de Clercq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-25 · STC-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Dickinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-15 · STC-Better with Age-Dickinson/Sheppard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Willemijn de Clercq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-10-18 · STC-Better with Age-Dickinson/Sheppard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Skrobut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
59.4%
38W–26L · 55.3% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 61.7% of games
9.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer