← Search

Natalie Pryde

Kirkland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 113W–82L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Natalie Pryde to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
W
2026-09-11 · BC-Imus · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sun Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-1
W
2026-07-23 · Shot Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sun Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · BC-Vegarra · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brett Shell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · Shot Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sun Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-01 · Shot Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sun Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-22 · BC-Hung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · BC-Hung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · BC-Hung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-14 · BC-Ball Hunters-Taylor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-08 · BC-Ball Hunters-Taylor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Huard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-01-31 · BC-Ball Hunters-Taylor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sun Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · BC-Ball Hunters-Taylor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sun Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
57.6%
53W–39L · 52% of games
8.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 60.8% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
21W–14L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
38.5%
10W–16L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
39 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer