← Search

Dana Landry

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 94W–84L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Dana Landry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
W
2026-09-11 · BC-Imus · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Goetzmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Ingrid Sarapuu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · with Ann Imus championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · NWW-BC-Rice · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · BC-Hung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · BC-Hung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · NWW-BC-Rice · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Sacks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · BC-Hung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · NWW-BC-Rice · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Imus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · BC-Hung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Pryde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · NWW-BC-Rice · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · BC-Hung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 56% of games
4.0
50.7%
36W–35L · 48.8% of games
7.0
60.6%
20W–13L · 55.1% of games
8.0
59%
23W–16L · 53.3% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
58 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams