← Search

Cindy Goetzmann

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 35W–31L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cindy Goetzmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-09-11 · BC-Imus · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · AYTC-String Theory-Sieg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Holmgren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · AYTC-String Theory-Sieg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Holmgren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-24 · AYTC-String Theory-Sieg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Holmgren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-19 · AYTC-String Theory-Sieg · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Holmgren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · BC-Hung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Beebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-27 · BC-Hung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Hung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · BC-Landry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Beebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · BC-Landry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katrina Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-04 · BC-Landry · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Stimpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-30 · BC-Free Agents-Hung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Beebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-23 · BC-Free Agents-Hung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Beebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
53.8%
21W–18L · 54.1% of games
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.2% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 43% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal