Search

Kim Weyer

Snohomish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
174 matches · 88W–86L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
21%
down to 3.5
79%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 13% down · 87% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.59. Higher than today’s 3.56 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Snohomish · 4.0
6 of 8
WA · 4.0
630 of 782

Kim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kim has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kim has gone from the 81st to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
43.5%
27W–35L · 49.4% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53% of games
8.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 49.9% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
57.5%
23W–17L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history174 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Ruscha
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tony Carey
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akari Fried
+0.046better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Racquel Johnson
0.034below expectation — took 41% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Traci Huffer / Wendy Parker
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akari Fried
+0.056better than expected — took 67% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akari Fried
+0.030better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Brouelette
+0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tonee Rockwell
+0.040better than expected — took 43% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jungmann
0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Colleen Tracy
0.020below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Tracy
0.011below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tonee Rockwell
+0.009about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.