← Search

Christine Brakke

Kent, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 49W–32L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Christine Brakke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-09-13 · LRC-Moll-Lakewood Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheri Borden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · LRC-Moll-Lakewood Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheri Borden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · BETC-Shutt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Higashi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · BETC-Shutt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenji Yoshino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · BETC-Shutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Higashi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-19 · BETC-Shutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Higashi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-10-25 · BETC-Hollar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Shen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-10-12 · BETC-Hollar · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JOANNE SHUTT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-09-27 · BETC-Hollar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Shen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-25 · BETC-Point Taken-Shaheen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Nagai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-19 · BETC-Point Taken-Shaheen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-30 · BETC-Point Taken-Shaheen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nona Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.9%
22W–16L · 50.7% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 60.5% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert